Promise-action mismatch possible
Public commitment and later vote need review
Civic Signal
Your Civic Agent keeps watch when you cannot.
Local councils, legislatures and public bodies make decisions continuously. Civic Signal is being designed to monitor the representative record and bring important changes back to you according to the jurisdictions, issues and rules you chose.
Interactive concept. The application is in development.
Illustrative Civic Agent · not live
Public commitment and later vote need review Review the record?
Fresh confirmation or an explicit standing instruction. Never an invented preference.
01
Your own persistent checks and balances.
Government keeps working when you stop paying attention. Your Civic Agent keeps watching. The planned service extends your attention while you work, raise a family, travel, sleep or simply enjoy life.
Illustrative Civic Agent · not live
Promise-action mismatch possible
Public commitment and later vote need review
Public commitment and later vote need review Review the record?
Fresh confirmation or an explicit standing instruction. Never an invented preference.
02
What it watches
Meetings, agendas, votes, spending, commitments, public statements, disclosures, committees, amendments, responses and corrections. Shared source monitoring belongs to Civic Ledger; RMR applies it to representative accountability.
AGENT-02Civic Agents
Visible Civic Agent trail
Concept · planned- Find relevant record
- Connect representative, office and term
- Explain with sources
- Compare chosen rules
- Alert participant
- Prepare optional response
- Execute only within explicit authority
03
Find. Connect. Explain.
Retrieve the relevant public record. Match the action to the representative, office, term and issue. Produce a concise source-backed briefing.
Illustrative profile
Sample Representative
Member of Parliament · Sample Riding
Canada · Current sample termDigital ID plannedOpen the record.
Observed public record · Civic LedgerContributed evidenceCommunity civic signalsAI-assisted analysisProposed models · separate from evidence
Votes · fictional sourcePublished minutesApr 18, 2028 · Retrieved · Context available
Votes · fictional sourceRecorded decisionMar 02, 2028 · Human review · Correction link
No item shown is a real allegation or public record.
Correction history visible
Illustrative profile. All records, dates, and statuses are fictional.
04
Compare. Alert. Prepare.
Identify alignment, conflict or unresolved questions relative to your chosen rules. Bring the event to you and prepare an optional response.
Illustrative Civic Agent · not live
Promise-action mismatch possible
Public commitment and later vote need review
Public commitment and later vote need review Review the record?
Fresh confirmation or an explicit standing instruction. Never an invented preference.
05
Execute permitted standing instructions
Only where you previously created a sufficiently explicit rule. For example: If my municipality proposes an increase above my configured threshold for this specific tax category, record concern and notify me. A clear match and sufficient evidence are required.
AGENT-04Civic Agents
Response authority
Concept · planned- 1Participant reviews matter
- 2Explicit response
- 3Human confirmed
- 1Defined conditions match
- 2Confidence threshold passes
- 3Standing authority is valid
- 4Executed under participant standing instruction
06
What it does not do
It does not fabricate citizens, invent preferences, infer broad political ideology and publish it as a vote, create official ballots, cast official election votes, sign legally binding government submissions without separate lawful authorization, or disguise agent execution as a fresh human click.
AGENT-03Civic Agents
Authority without impersonation
Concept · planned- Fabricated citizens
- Invented political preferences
- Official election votes
- Hidden agent execution
- Unauthorized binding submissions
- Research and source-backed briefing
- Fresh human-confirmed response
- Explicit standing-instruction execution
Keep the record moving
The participant defines the authority