Rate My Representatives
Join early access
The score

One interface. Multiple visible layers.

Start with the record and its limits. A final composite may exist later according to an approved published formula, but the decomposed components will remain inspectable.

Interactive concept. The application is in development.

Illustrative profile

Sample Representative

Member of Parliament · Sample Riding

Canada · Current sample termDigital ID planned
Methodology pending
Illustrative factor breakdown
1
Identity and office integritySource coverage: partialCommunity input: unavailable
2
Voting and policy recordUnder human reviewCommunity input: unavailable
3
Promises and stated positionsInsufficient source coverageCommunity input: unavailable
4
Evidence quality and confidenceWeight to be publishedCommunity input: unavailable
AI-assisted record analysisDirect authenticated sentimentStanding-instruction authenticated sentimentEvidence confidenceSource coverageCorrection statusUnverified inputAnonymous input
Correction history visible

Illustrative profile. All records, dates, and statuses are fictional.

Explore
01

Public-record analysis

Defined analysis of a representative’s public role, office and term. An unresolved question must not be converted into misconduct.

Illustrative profile

Sample Representative

Member of Parliament · Sample Riding

Canada · Current sample termDigital ID planned
Open the record.
Observed public record · Civic LedgerContributed evidenceCommunity civic signalsAI-assisted analysisProposed models · separate from evidence
Votes · fictional sourcePublished minutesApr 18, 2028 · Retrieved · Context available
Votes · fictional sourceRecorded decisionMar 02, 2028 · Human review · Correction link

No item shown is a real allegation or public record.

Correction history visible

Illustrative profile. All records, dates, and statuses are fictional.

02

Evidence confidence · Source coverage

Show uncertainty independently from how much of the record is available. Missing evidence is not a negative finding.

METHOD-01Architecture

Keep uncertainty visible

Concept · planned
Evidence states
  • SUPPORTED
  • NOT SUPPORTED
  • UNRESOLVED
  • CONTRADICTORY
  • INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
Hold unresolved material
  • Unknown is not false
  • Missing evidence is not misconduct
Only resolved evidence enters approved factors according to published rules.
03

Direct authenticated sentiment

A qualifying participant reviewed the matter and confirmed their response. Label: Human confirmed.

SIGNAL-01Architecture

Four possible origins

Concept · planned
Direct authenticated
  • Human confirmed
Standing-instruction authenticated
  • Executed under participant standing instruction
Unverified
  • No qualifying attestation
Anonymous
  • No authenticated civic identity association
Participation status and execution origin are distinct.A civic signal is not an official ballot.
04

Standing-instruction authenticated sentiment

A qualifying participant previously authorized a sufficiently explicit rule. Label: Executed under participant standing instruction.

AGENT-04Civic Agents

Response authority

Concept · planned
Fresh decision
  • 1Participant reviews matter
  • 2Explicit response
  • 3Human confirmed
Prior explicit rule
  • 1Defined conditions match
  • 2Confidence threshold passes
  • 3Standing authority is valid
  • 4Executed under participant standing instruction
Broad values alone cannot authorize a public response.
05

Unverified input · Anonymous input

Keep both independently visible and separate from authenticated sentiment. Neither authentication nor popularity makes an opinion true.

Illustrative participationChoose how to contribute
Your sample contribution

“Please show the source and the representative response beside this record.”

Human confirmed

Authentication identifies participation status. It does not make an opinion true.

Illustrative profile

Sample Representative

City Councillor · Ward 8

Profile status
Sample only
Source coverage
Partial · text label
Methodology
In development

This changes presentation only. Information and reading order remain intact.

06

Correction status

Show disputes, changes, evidence updates and the method version. No composite score is live; no final weights are approved.

Illustrative profile

Sample Representative

Member of Parliament · Sample Riding

Canada · Current sample termDigital ID planned
Methodology pending
Illustrative factor breakdown
1
Identity and office integritySource coverage: partialCommunity input: unavailable
2
Voting and policy recordUnder human reviewCommunity input: unavailable
3
Promises and stated positionsInsufficient source coverageCommunity input: unavailable
4
Evidence quality and confidenceWeight to be publishedCommunity input: unavailable
AI-assisted record analysisDirect authenticated sentimentStanding-instruction authenticated sentimentEvidence confidenceSource coverageCorrection statusUnverified inputAnonymous input
Correction history visible

Illustrative profile. All records, dates, and statuses are fictional.

Keep the record moving

Find who represents you. See what they did. Make your judgment.

How the result will be built