Rate My Representatives
Join early access
Trust and evidence

The score must show its work.

Evidence, interpretation, confidence, community signal and corrections will remain inspectable. Do not make an unresolved fact look resolved simply because the interface expects a number.

Interactive concept. The application is in development.

Illustrative profile

Sample Representative

Member of Parliament · Sample Riding

Canada · Current sample termDigital ID planned
Methodology pending
Illustrative factor breakdown
1
Identity and office integritySource coverage: partialCommunity input: unavailable
2
Voting and policy recordUnder human reviewCommunity input: unavailable
3
Promises and stated positionsInsufficient source coverageCommunity input: unavailable
4
Evidence quality and confidenceWeight to be publishedCommunity input: unavailable
AI-assisted record analysisDirect authenticated sentimentStanding-instruction authenticated sentimentEvidence confidenceSource coverageCorrection statusUnverified inputAnonymous input
Correction history visible

Illustrative profile. All records, dates, and statuses are fictional.

Explore
01

Public record

What happened? Identify the government or public source supplied through Civic Ledger infrastructure, its date, scope and provenance.

Illustrative profile

Sample Representative

Member of Parliament · Sample Riding

Canada · Current sample termDigital ID planned
Open the record.
Observed public record · Civic LedgerContributed evidenceCommunity civic signalsAI-assisted analysisProposed models · separate from evidence
Votes · fictional sourcePublished minutesApr 18, 2028 · Retrieved · Context available
Votes · fictional sourceRecorded decisionMar 02, 2028 · Human review · Correction link

No item shown is a real allegation or public record.

Correction history visible

Illustrative profile. All records, dates, and statuses are fictional.

02

Interpretation

What relationship does the evidence support? Keep machine-assisted analysis distinct from observed records and political judgment.

TRUST-03Trust & evidence

AI record work versus human judgment

Concept · planned
AI-assisted record work
  • Find sources
  • Classify records
  • Compare statements
  • Flag contradictions
  • Assess coverage
  • Draft analysis
Human civic judgment
  • Confirm context
  • Submit civic signal
  • Review high-impact claims
  • Approve publication
  • Resolve disputes
  • Correct records
Human civic judgment required.
03

Confidence

How complete and clear is the evidence? Mark uncertainty explicitly and hold materially unresolved claims.

METHOD-01Architecture

Keep uncertainty visible

Concept · planned
Evidence states
  • SUPPORTED
  • NOT SUPPORTED
  • UNRESOLVED
  • CONTRADICTORY
  • INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
Hold unresolved material
  • Unknown is not false
  • Missing evidence is not misconduct
Only resolved evidence enters approved factors according to published rules.
04

Community signal

How participating people responded. Community opinion never becomes proof that an event occurred.

Illustrative participationChoose how to contribute
Your sample contribution

“Please show the source and the representative response beside this record.”

Human confirmed

Authentication identifies participation status. It does not make an opinion true.

Illustrative profile

Sample Representative

City Councillor · Ward 8

Profile status
Sample only
Source coverage
Partial · text label
Methodology
In development

This changes presentation only. Information and reading order remain intact.

05

Signal provenance

Was the response human-confirmed, agent-executed under standing instruction, unverified or anonymous? Preserve both participation status and execution provenance.

SIGNAL-01Architecture

Four possible origins

Concept · planned
Direct authenticated
  • Human confirmed
Standing-instruction authenticated
  • Executed under participant standing instruction
Unverified
  • No qualifying attestation
Anonymous
  • No authenticated civic identity association
Participation status and execution origin are distinct.A civic signal is not an official ballot.
06

Corrections

What changed after challenge or new evidence? Preserve the original record, explain revisions and recalculate affected results.

HOW-04How it works

Correctable memory timeline

Concept · planned
Visible history
  • 1Record added
  • 2Source checked
  • 3Human reviewed
  • 4Representative notified
  • 5Response received
  • 6Dispute opened
  • 7Correction published
  • 8Provenance anchored
History extends. It does not silently disappear.Provenance is not proof of truth.
07

Published formula

The Light Mathematics Protocol is a proposed transparent composition framework. Factors, confidence treatment, missing evidence, contradictions, exclusions, corrections and formula versions must be inspectable before a composite launches. No score is live.

TRUST-01Trust & evidence

Accountability layers remain independently visible

Concept · planned
Public record
  • Public-record analysis
  • Evidence confidence
  • Source coverage
  • Correction status
Community civic signals
  • Direct authenticated sentiment
  • Standing-instruction authenticated sentiment
  • Unverified input
  • Anonymous input
Proposed composition
  • Only resolved evidence under published rules
  • Factors and exclusions inspectable
  • Versioned formula
  • Community signal stays distinct
No approved weights or live score.A composite may follow an approved published formula later.
Keep the record moving

Find who represents you. See what they did. Make your judgment.

Read the methodology